Talk:zeptokilogram
The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process (permalink).
Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.
Created by A3A0, 7 hits on Google. A hypothetically possible term. Between the multiple SI prefixes ("zepto" and "kilo") and the existence of a more standard term for the same measure (attogram), I'm not sure why anyone would use this. That said, terms like hectokilogram do exist, so who knows. 70.172.194.25 02:10, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
- The difference I see is that hectokilogram cannot be replaced with a shorter word, since there is no established SI prefix for 100,000. There is no tradition of using SI prefixes that undo each other ... the word, as you say, is attogram. Sometimes a particular multiple is so often used in a specific science that they create a new word for it .... meteorologists creating bar and millibar for example ... but this is the opposite of that process ... making a word more difficult instead of more convenient .... the only possible way I could see this being used is through its supposed abbreviations, z and zkg. But Im not convinced .... the 7 google hits dont look real, anyway, .... not only are they duplicates of each other, but it looks like they are user-editable websites like us. —Soap— 11:02, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
RFV Failed, persumably created as a hoax. Ioaxxere (talk) 21:40, 14 April 2023 (UTC)