Template talk:R:NLW

Very interesting

@I'm so meta even this acronym Compare the following:

• {{#time: M j, Y | 30.09.06 }} → Sep 30, 2006
• {{#time: M j, Y | 17.09.10 }} → Sep 17, 2024
• {{#time: M j, Y | 14.10.05 }} → Sep 17, 2024

Here be dragons (I promised I tested to see it it would work, but I did not anticipate this oddness). —JohnC5 09:31, 23 May 2015 (UTC)

@JohnC5: That's bizarre. I have no idea why that should be. — I.S.M.E.T.A. 09:52, 23 May 2015 (UTC)

@I'm so meta even this acronym: I don't believe that it should be that way... Methinks it is an error. Do we know anyone who might have an idea why this happens? —JohnC5 10:01, 23 May 2015 (UTC)

@JohnC5: Grease Pit? (FWIW, though, I don't think this revision-date–reformatting is particularly desirable.) — I.S.M.E.T.A. 10:05, 23 May 2015 (UTC)

@I'm so meta even this acronym: Fair enough, though I am curious whence this problem arises. —JohnC5 22:51, 23 May 2015 (UTC)

@JohnC5: Hmm, well, perhaps a member of Category:User template coder-4 could shed light on this anomaly. — I.S.M.E.T.A. 23:32, 23 May 2015 (UTC)