Template talk:Trichinellidae Hypernyms

From Wiktionary, the free dictionary
Latest comment: 7 months ago by DCDuring in topic RFD discussion: January 2022–October 2023
Jump to navigation Jump to search

RFD discussion: January 2022–October 2023

[edit]

The following information passed a request for deletion (permalink).

This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.


Tagged 1.5 years ago by User:JoeyChen (diff) but not listed. User:DCDuring as the creator. — Fytcha T | L | C 22:15, 15 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

See [1]. DCDuring (talk) 22:19, 15 January 2022 (UTC)Reply
Monotypic families don't necessarily remain so. In addition there are at least two other genera that are sometimes included in the family. DCDuring (talk) 22:23, 15 January 2022 (UTC)Reply
Also sometime useful to save keystrokes for higher taxa by substing. DCDuring (talk) 19:53, 31 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
To be clear, I'd prefer that such templates not be made unless there are multiple uses for them, but once made and in use at least once, why not keep them for the reasons stated? DCDuring (talk) 12:48, 30 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Tagged 1.5 years ago by User:JoeyChen (diff) but not listed. — Fytcha T | L | C 00:46, 16 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

More than 100 genera besides Bacillus are in this family. We just don't have entries for them yet. DCDuring (talk) 19:24, 31 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

RFD-kept both. This, that and the other (talk) 03:39, 30 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

To be clear, I'd prefer that such templates not be made unless there are multiple uses for them, but once made and in use at least once, why not keep them for the reasons stated? DCDuring (talk) 12:48, 30 October 2023 (UTC)Reply