Template talk:quadral

Deletion debate

The following information has failed Wiktionary's deletion process.

It should not be re-entered without careful consideration.

---

Template:quadral

There are no languages on the world with a quadral number. Therefore, this template is unnecessary. -- Prince Kassad 16:01, 6 September 2010 (UTC)

Move to WT:Bad jokes and other deleted nonsense? Delete. Mglovesfun (talk) 16:05, 6 September 2010 (UTC)

Either delete or move. --Bequw → τ 04:31, 8 September 2010 (UTC)

Move to what, Bequw?​—msh210℠ (talk) 18:43, 13 September 2010 (UTC)

The jokes page per Mg, but I personally don't see the humour. --Bequw → τ 00:17, 14 September 2010 (UTC)

Don't some conlangs have quadral number? If we allow their inclusion (even just in the appendix) then we'll probably need that template. —CodeCat 09:07, 14 September 2010 (UTC)

1. Which ones? 2. We probably don't have inflected forms in appendices (or I hope we don't). -- Prince Kassad 15:42, 14 September 2010 (UTC)

Proto-Germanic already has dual personal pronouns in the appendix, so a language that has a quadral pronoun would probably want an article for it. But it turns out I was mistaken; there are conlangs with a trial, but none I can find with a quadral. —CodeCat 16:26, 14 September 2010 (UTC)

Deleted. Mglovesfun (talk) 11:33, 27 January 2011 (UTC)

Sursurunga / Justification of template restoration

Apparently Sursurunga has a number that has been called quadral, though it's also been called other things. Quadral in this case implies four or more, not simply four. Mglovesfun (talk) 12:32, 24 March 2011 (UTC)

Sursurunga has quadral number; see gimhat, githat, gamhat, and dihat. — Raifʻhār Doremítzwr ~ (U · T · C) ~ 12:34, 24 March 2011 (UTC)

@ Martin: I've edited the entry for quadral accordingly. — Raifʻhār Doremítzwr ~ (U · T · C) ~ 12:39, 24 March 2011 (UTC)

Cheers. Mglovesfun (talk) 12:40, 24 March 2011 (UTC)

No problem. BTW, you said in your deletion comment that this template should have a better format. What did you have in mind? — Raifʻhār Doremítzwr ~ (U · T · C) ~ 12:42, 24 March 2011 (UTC)

I'd misunderstood the template. Mglovesfun (talk) 11:09, 13 April 2011 (UTC)

Languages never cease to amaze me. -- Prince Kassad 14:28, 24 March 2011 (UTC)

Second deletion debate

The following information has failed Wiktionary's deletion process.

It should not be re-entered without careful consideration.

---

Template:dual, Template:trial, Template:quadral, Template:paucal

Not (or no longer) in use anywhere. Module:gender and number supports the dual number, and the other three can be added it to it very easily when the need arises. —CodeCat 20:00, 23 June 2013 (UTC)

Template:m-s, Template:f-s, Template:n-s, Template:m-d, Template:f-d, Template:n-d

Same as above. —CodeCat 00:31, 24 June 2013 (UTC)

RFD-failed. —Μετάknowledge^{discuss/deeds} 16:38, 19 July 2013 (UTC)