Template talk:wo-noun

Definite articles

When I use this template on a word, say mbokk yi, it creates a link for the definite article. Personally, I think this is distracting and unneccesary, since it's already labeled as the definite form, so the reader can infer that yi/ji/bi/wi is the definite article. If the community disagrees, then I'm more than willing to add a Wolof entry to the yi/ji/bi/wi pages. GoateeBoi (talk) 18:12, 28 December 2020 (UTC)

@GoateeBoi Not everyone is familiar with the Wolof language, so you may add entries for the definite articles. Also, consult the Grease Pit regarding perhaps {{ml-noun}} when you can. --Apisite (talk) 22:58, 28 December 2020 (UTC)

Not sure it's distracting, but I'm not opposed to delinking it. The definite article entries definitely need to be created; that's something I should get to. —Μετάknowledge^{discuss/deeds} 05:52, 29 December 2020 (UTC)