[[Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/-yéh₁-|-yéh₁-]] not in [[:Category:Proto-Indo-European verb-forming suffixes]], then [[Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/-éh₁yeti|-éh₁yeti]]?
Fragment of a discussion from User talk:Rua
OK, I simply took it from the definition "of the athematic stative verbal suffix" for -éh₁yeti. Shouldn't be -éh₁yeti better defined then as "1) Creates stative (or durative) thematic verbs from ¿(?perfective¿)? roots. 2) Creates stative (or durative) thematic verbs from nominals." like -éh₁ti, or "Thematic(-producing) variant of -éh₁ti,"?
Perhaps just {{synonym of|-éh₁ti|lang=ine-pro}}?
We have already that, in Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/-nós and Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/-tós, but they have exactly the same definition. In this case they should be different but parallel.