User talk:YAAM

Definition from Wiktionary, the free dictionary
Jump to: navigation, search

Hello, please remain demure while you are here, we're a rather boring lot by Uncyclopedia's standards. Your userpage is unacceptable for Wiktionary at the moment, and I will delete it unless you clean it up. "say it, don't spray it" is an interesting expression, thank you for adding it. I attach the standard welcome template for experienced wikiers. Conrad.Irwin 14:04, 26 June 2008 (UTC)

Thanks, though I hate to see how you'll sign your name at me. Conrad.Irwin 14:26, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
If no one ticks me nor anyone else off whom I care about, then they'll not have to see my full name signed. If anyone wants to see how my full name is signed anyway, they'd better not tick me off on purpose -_- ; they can just visit my Uncyclopedian userpage instead. --YAAM 14:39, 26 June 2008 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wiktionary!

If you have edited Wikipedia, you probably already know some basics, but Wiktionary does have a few conventions of its own. Please take a moment to learn our basics before jumping in.

First, all articles should be in our standard format, even if they are not yet complete. Please take a moment to familiarize yourself with it. You can use one of our pre-defined article templates by typing the name of a non-existent article into the search box and hitting 'Go'. You can link Wikipedia pages, including your user page, using [[w:pagename]], {{pedia}}, or {{wikipedia}}.

Notice that article titles are case-sensitive and are not capitalized unless, like proper nouns, they are ordinarily capitalized (Poland or January). Also, take a moment to familiarize yourself with our criteria for inclusion, since Wiktionary is not an encyclopedia. Don't go looking for a Village pump – we have a Beer parlour. Note that while Wikipedia likes redirects, Wiktionary deletes most redirects (especially spelling variations), in favor of short entries. Please do not copy entries here from Wikipedia if they are in wikipedia:Category:Copy to Wiktionary; they are moved by bot, and will appear presently in the Transwiki: namespace.

A further major caveat is that a "Citation" on Wiktionary is synonymous with a "Quotation", we use these primary sources to construct dictionary definitions from evidence of the word being used. "References" (aka "Citations" on Wikipedia) are used predominantly for verifying Etymologies and usage notes, not the definitions themselves. This is partly to avoid copyright violation, and partly to ensure that we don't fall into the trap of adding "list words", or words that while often defined are never used in practice.

Note for experienced Wikipedians:
Wiktionary is run in a very different manner from Wikipedia and you will have a better experience if you do not assume the two are similar in culture. Please remember that despite your experience on Wikipedia, that experience may not always be applicable here. While you do not need to be an expert, or anything close to one, to contribute, please be as respectful of local policies and community practices as you can. Be aware that well-meaning Wikipedians have unfortunately found themselves blocked in the past for perceived disruption due to misunderstandings. To prevent a similar outcome, remember the maxim: be bold, but don't be reckless!
Having said that, we welcome Wikipedians, who have useful skills and experience to offer. The following are a couple of the most jarring differences between our projects that Wikipedians may want to learn up front, so things go smoothly for everyone. Changing policy pages on Wiktionary is very strongly discouraged. If you think something needs changing, please discuss it at the beer parlour, after which we may formally vote on the issue. You should also note that Wiktionary has very different user-space policies, we are here to build a dictionary and your user-page exists only to facilitate that. In particular we have voted to explicitly ban all userboxes with the exception of {{Babel}}; please do not create or use them.

We hope you enjoy editing Wiktionary and being a Wiktionarian. Conrad.Irwin 14:04, 26 June 2008 (UTC)


Greetings. The words friend and motherfucker are not actually antonyms (try swapping the two in "Yeah, that lazy motherfucker is my best friend" or in "Why the fuck did you do that to my friend, you dumb motherfucker"), so I rolled back your edits to those pages. Notice that one sense of the latter actually defines it to mean friend. You may be interested in the Wikisaurus project. That's a great place for lists of friend/foe terms. :-) Rod (A. Smith) 14:43, 2 September 2008 (UTC)


This is actually a proper noun title of a novel (see w:Scaramouche). As the title of a novel, it is not dictionary material. --EncycloPetey 05:11, 4 September 2008 (UTC)

wonderful person isn't dictionary material --- WHAT???[edit]

What the living F^^^ do you MEAN it's not dictionary material?! Did you even BOTHER to VISIT the Google Books link??? There is a WHOPPING 442 hits on Google books. You read it right -- FOUR-HUNDRED FORTY-TWO HITS ON GOOGLE BOOKS! That ought to make it dictionary material, you think?! --YAAM 01:06, 30 September 2008 (UTC)

This is what we call a "sum of parts". That is, the meaning is simply the combination of the meranings of wonderful and person, just like "rainy Tuesday", "orange book", or "quick rabbit". We do not create entries for such combinations. --EncycloPetey 01:04, 30 September 2008 (UTC)

Yeah, I can cite it[edit]

See WT:ELE#Example sentences. It specifically says "If no quotation can be found, it is strongly encouraged to create an example sentence". "An" refers to one, not two. Teh Rote 12:34, 30 September 2008 (UTC)

Well it's changed now. I can now put more than one on. --YAAM 16:05, 30 September 2008 (UTC)


As stated on that page: Please do not modify that page without a WT:VOTE. The reason your wording may not be non-controversial is that it strongly implies more than one example sentence is good, I do not know whether all other editors agree with this. Conrad.Irwin 17:13, 30 September 2008 (UTC)



Boldness is good, but you might want to take it down a notch. When someone undoes something you've done, that likely means you shouldn't have done it, and therefore that you shouldn't turn around and immediately redo it. If you're unsure about something, ask.

RuakhTALK 01:07, 1 October 2008 (UTC)

Sorry that I reverted you without explanation. Usually people don't mess with other's talk pages here, especially for reasons of their own convenience. It is extra suspicious IMO when the messer has had some kind of confrontation with the messee. DCDuring TALK 02:01, 1 October 2008 (UTC)