- Voting on: Revising two major policies as follows:
The contents of sourced versions are absolutely identical to the current policies, except for the addition of links to supporting votes at the bottom.
- Vote starts: 00:01, 9 April 2011 (UTC)
- Vote ends: 23.59, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
- Vote created: Daniel. 02:00, 2 April 2011 (UTC)
- Support Daniel. 07:56, 9 April 2011 (UTC)
- Support —Internoob (Disc•Cont) 21:10, 10 April 2011 (UTC) transparency FTW
- Support - -sche (discuss) 20:49, 25 April 2011 (UTC)
- Weak support: I support the principle, but feel ambivalently about some of the implementation details. All in all it's for the good, I think. —RuakhTALK 04:22, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
- Support Dan Polansky 09:03, 2 May 2011 (UTC) Much like Ruakh. I support linking in some way from parts of CFI to votes that support them. I also support doing so via the wiki technique of references. I have doubts about some placements of references, such as those that place the reference after the first sentence of the paragraph when it was the whole paragraph that was sourced from the vote. Nonetheless, this looks like a good start, good enough or even pretty good.
I support that next changes to CFI are added with a reference to a vote even when that vote does not state that a reference should be added to CFI. --Dan Polansky 09:03, 2 May 2011 (UTC)