Talk:Winn-Dixie
Latest comment: 5 years ago by BD2412 in topic RFD discussion: August 2018–February 2019
The following information has failed Wiktionary's deletion process (permalink).
It should not be re-entered without careful consideration.
We don't have Walmart, Tesco, Walgreens, Hooters or Lidl so why should we have this? --Robbie SWE (talk) 17:14, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
- "all words in all languages"? SemperBlotto (talk) 04:56, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
- Not a genericized trademark > delete. Per utramque cavernam 08:14, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
- Delete for the reason given by PUC. Don't think WT:BRAND has been satisfied in this case. — SGconlaw (talk) 08:19, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
- That doesn't alter the fact that I didn't know about Winn-Dixie. Maybe we should include retail chains. Abstain. DonnanZ (talk) 08:33, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
- Delete per PUC. --SanctMinimalicen (talk) 23:18, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
- Replace with
{{no entry}}and{{in wikipedia}}. DCDuring (talk) 19:21, 17 August 2018 (UTC) - Delete / or Replace, whatever. Fay Freak (talk) 18:47, 22 August 2018 (UTC)
- Delete / soft-redirect to Wikipedia, per DCDuring. - -sche (discuss) 20:29, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
- Abstain. First off, the nomination does not refer to WT:CFI or any CFI-based rationale as formulated; it rather makes some form of extrapolative argument. To amend this, let us assume the nomination refers to WT:CFI#Company names; then, let me point out that the section of CFI has no consensus. That said, I admit that multi-word company names are more liable to deletion than single-word company names. By contrast, I support inclusion of Walmart, Tesco, Walgreens, Hooters and Lidl as company names. --Dan Polansky (talk) 14:26, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
- Keep by the fcuk criteria. DTLHS (talk) 16:51, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
- What does fcuk have to do with this? bd2412 T 20:26, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Replaced with {{no entry}} and {{in wikipedia}}. bd2412 T 03:36, 12 February 2019 (UTC)