Talk:female genital cutting
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Deletion discussion[edit]
The following information passed a request for deletion.
This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.
On one hand, Talk:female genital mutilation somehow passed. On the other hand, some of the arguments protecting that don't refer here. And this is rather ridiculous. —Μετάknowledgediscuss/deeds 13:45, 26 April 2013 (UTC)
- Keep, of course. There is nothing ridiculous about it, this is a specific set term which is widely used in the literature. Needless to say it does not apply to any old "cutting", but to a specific cultural tradition. Ƿidsiþ 14:43, 26 April 2013 (UTC)
- How many any old cuttings of the female genitals are there? Mglovesfun (talk) 00:23, 27 April 2013 (UTC)
- Any legitimate surgical procedure performed on female genitalia could be considered a form of "cutting:" episiotomy, labiaplasty, various forms of female-to-male sex reassignment surgery. The use of cutting in this phrase is narrow and restrictive. Strong keep. Astral (talk) 01:12, 27 April 2013 (UTC)
- How many any old cuttings of the female genitals are there? Mglovesfun (talk) 00:23, 27 April 2013 (UTC)
- Keep per Astral. DAVilla 23:14, 27 April 2013 (UTC)