Talk:vaginal sex

Deletion discussion

The following information passed a request for deletion.

This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.

---

vaginal sex

Looks pretty obvious, doesn’t it? --Æ&Œ (talk) 18:43, 16 November 2012 (UTC)

I personally think it's a dumb entry. However, note that (according to us) it's only vaginal sex if the penis is inserted, and not (say) a dildo, or the fist; if true, that might make it less than SoP. Compare anal sex, where anything can be inserted into the anus, not just a penis. Equinox ◑ 21:20, 16 November 2012 (UTC)

Looks like an important point to me. DAVilla 06:54, 17 November 2012 (UTC)

I seriously doubt anyone differentiates vaginal sex and anal sex that way. Some people may say a penis has to be inserted in both cases in order for the definition to be met, while others may say that the insertion of other objects (dildo, fist, light bulb, zucchini, gerbil) will also fit the definition, but I cannot believe anyone applies the penis-only rule to the definition of "vaginal sex" but not to the definition of "anal sex". —Angr 19:41, 17 November 2012 (UTC)

Re entry: I think widening the def is the solution. Re Angr: No. Just no. We gerbils have rights too. —Μετάknowledge^{discuss/deeds} 06:03, 18 November 2012 (UTC)

Fine, I believe you. No need to be so graphic, all of you. DAVilla 16:31, 22 November 2012 (UTC)

Closed. no consensus to delete. bd2412 T 14:42, 4 November 2013 (UTC)