Template talk:treq
I don't like this template, Wonderfool. Why would anyone want to generally request more translations? Either you have a specific translation request, for which Wiktionary:Translation requests can be used, or the word should be nominated for ToW. Ncik 19:14, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
- It's true, it is a bit crappy. I put it up as a part-time solution to keep track of words that maybe could go into WT:TOW. But could we keep it there for a bit longer, until we've sorted out what to do with our 2 projects (there will inevitably be some kind of merge between the two projects due to their common ground). --Wonderfool 19:23, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
- Having a template to nominate articles for ToW is maybe an acceptable idea, although I like your approach of adding their talk page to a category better, since I think disfiguring pages with templates should only be allowed in grave situations (i.e. when containing suspicious content or being in an entirely insatisfactory state: rfd, rfv, rfc). Ncik 19:30, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
The following discussion has been moved from Wiktionary:Requests for moves, mergers and splits (permalink).
This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.
Wonderfool made this template years ago. Doesn't seem to be used much. Maybe there's a better template around...--Zo3rWer (talk) 12:13, 2 October 2015 (UTC)
The following discussion has been moved from Wiktionary:Requests for deletion/Others (permalink).
This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.
This template is unused and t-needed should be used instead if someone wants a translation for a specific language. Matthias Buchmeier (talk) 18:03, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
- Redirect
{{treq}}to{{t-needed}}, and eventually move{{t-needed}}to{{treq}}because 4 keystrokes are fewer than 8. DCDuring TALK 20:00, 15 February 2016 (UTC)- It won't work as they don't work the same way.
{{treq}}doesn't take a language, and{{t-needed}}requires one. If you're only proposing this for the name change then please, just propose the name change on its own. Renard Migrant (talk) 12:30, 16 February 2016 (UTC)- Though @DCDuring if your aim is to break Wiktionary pages, I say you're doing the right thing. Renard Migrant (talk) 15:16, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
- I just want the end result to be fewer keystrokes.
{{t-req}}would be a name consistent with our current naming practices. Now, if we could just get some contributors who will fulfill some of those requests.... DCDuring TALK 17:02, 21 February 2016 (UTC)- Well we can't redirect while it's still being used as they're not compatible, so we delete first and rename later. Renard Migrant (talk) 17:23, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
- I just want the end result to be fewer keystrokes.
- Though @DCDuring if your aim is to break Wiktionary pages, I say you're doing the right thing. Renard Migrant (talk) 15:16, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
- It won't work as they don't work the same way.
- Delete. —CodeCat 20:05, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. Renard Migrant (talk) 12:30, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
- Deprecate but keep. Use AbuseFilter to deprecate it on the technical level by preventing saving pages that contain the template if possible or explain why it is not possible. Point: make page histories legible. --Dan Polansky (talk) 10:02, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
- Deleted. - -sche (discuss) 07:18, 18 August 2016 (UTC)