Wiktionary:Votes/bt-2010-03/User:Darkicebot for bot status 4

Definition from Wiktionary, the free dictionary
Jump to: navigation, search

User:Darkicebot for bot status[edit]

  • Nomination: I hereby request the Bot flag for User:Darkicebot for the following purposes:
    My bot made all of the form-of entries for the Ido verbs frapar, batar, and cantar, after I updated our conjugation template to include all the verb form-of conjugations after getting help on that from users on the Ido Wiktionary. I am 100% positive that my bot adds all of the forms correctly and that all of the forms are correct.
    I did as everyone requested and did not even think about getting this bot a bot flag for the past few months, so like everyone said, I am now requesting the bot flag again because of the time that has passed in between. My bots' edits have been completely correct as of right now and has not had any problems with erroneous form-of entries being made.
    I hope that you can look past the differences that everyone has about me and please seriously consider this bot request. Thanks!
    Razorflame 15:36, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
  • Vote ends: 23:59 5 April 2010 (UTC)
  • Vote started: 15:36, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
  • Discussion:

See previous RfBs

Support[edit]

  1. Symbol support vote.svg Support Rising Sun talk? contributions 21:02, 30 March 2010 (UTC). The more conjobots, the better.
    Sure, if they're run by responsible users or Wonderfools :) — [ R·I·C ] opiaterein — 21:12, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
    Exactly, and Razorflame is one of the latter. Wonderfool is non-Latino, Razorflame is non-Latino. A coincidence? I think not. --Rising Sun talk? contributions 21:18, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
    RF isn't cool enough to be WF. — [ R·I·C ] opiaterein — 21:23, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
    Then stop accusing me of it. I'm uncool too --Rising Sun talk? contributions 21:33, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
    I don't remember accusing you of it but ok :D — [ R·I·C ] opiaterein — 21:40, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
    Meant as a vous you, not a tu you. --Rising Sun talk? contributions 21:45, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
    Well, maybe more as an on --Rising Sun talk? contributions 21:47, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
    Ah yes, I forgot about my premise. Oops. --Rising Sun talk? contributions 22:00, 30 March 2010 (UTC)

Oppose[edit]

  1. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Be sure to read those past votes, they're fun. — [ R·I·C ] opiaterein — 21:46, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
    Are you actually voting oppose based upon how we've intereacted, or based upon how my bot runs because when I had the bot flag, my bot was running flawlessly without any problems, so I don't see what thing has gotten stuck with you. Razorflame 22:23, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
    I'm voting based on your attitude and the fact that I don't trust you at all. — [ R·I·C ] opiaterein — 22:31, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
    Biased, like always. You just can't stay away from me, can you, even though I've asked you to...Razorflame 23:05, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
    I'm not turning a blind eye to your reckless behaviour. — [ R·I·C ] opiaterein — 23:54, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
    C'mon opi, you're opposing not because he's reckless. It's because he's Latino! --Vahagn Petrosyan 02:27, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
    I was going to support, but now I find out he's Latino, that changes everything! --Rising Sun talk? contributions 10:12, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
    I am not Latino. Razorflame 20:59, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
    Good, I can support then --Rising Sun talk? contributions 21:02, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
  2. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Equinox 15:48, 31 March 2010 (UTC) Absolutely not. Look at his talk page to see how RF repeatedly breaks promises and cannot be trusted. Giving him an automated mechanism to do his damage is very unwise. Equinox 15:48, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
    I do not intend to make any errors with my bot. I just want to add Ido verb forms after they've been verified by me and Artomo, who is a regular user on the Ido Wiktionary and with whom I have a very good relationship with. I am only asking for a chance to prove to you that I can be trusted with a bot on this project. That is all I want to do, is to help this Wiktionary to the best of my ability. Razorflame 20:15, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
    I'm sure you don't intend to make errors in your manual entries either, but you still do. For you to speak of trust is a joke. Can you count how many times users have told you not to make edits in a language because you don't know anything about it, promised you wouldn't do it again, and then moved on to another language with which you had little or no familiarity? — [ R·I·C ] opiaterein — 20:19, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
  3. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Mglovesfun (talk) 21:09, 31 March 2010 (UTC). Per Equinox. RF, give the code to someone else (Rising Sun) and be done with it. Mglovesfun (talk) 21:09, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
    DRB in 3 languages? Come one, I don't want to be the sucker who gets all the bot jobs from all the users who fail bot votes. --Rising Sun talk? contributions 21:25, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
    This is a fairly routine request and might I add that my bot WAS flagged earlier and it made all the right edits? It was working perfectly. I find it unfair to just assume that one does not know how to handle a bot appropriately if he's been a global bot operator for more than two years now and who has good knowledge when it comes to what to do with bots. I seriously question most of the oppose votes as being biased just because you believe that I am not trustworthy. If you really think that I will run my bot incorrectly, then unblock my bot and I'll do 100 test edits to show you that it won't make erroneous edits. Razorflame 21:38, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
  4. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose. Oh god, RF, you've no idea. DNW --Rising Sun talk? contributions 21:44, 31 March 2010 (UTC)

Abstain[edit]

Decision[edit]

I am going to withdraw this request not because I know that it will fail but because I know that people are not being encouraging enough and willing enough to let people try to do their best to help this project, only to be shot down by people who have no idea the potential that they are surpressing. I find it very depressing that people take this kind of stance over a more encouraging response. Razorflame 21:47, 31 March 2010 (UTC)