Wiktionary:Votes/sy-2015-06/User:JohnC5 for admin: difference between revisions

From Wiktionary, the free dictionary
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Content deleted Content added
→‎User:JohnC5 for admin: Support on the condition that the nominated editor will lose admin rights if a confirmation vote does not achieve consensus for keeping admin rights; oppose to the extent the condition is not met. ...
Line 16: Line 16:
# {{support}} — ''[[User:Ungoliant MMDCCLXIV|Ungoliant]] <sup>([[User talk:Ungoliant MMDCCLXIV|falai]])</sup>'' 14:01, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
# {{support}} — ''[[User:Ungoliant MMDCCLXIV|Ungoliant]] <sup>([[User talk:Ungoliant MMDCCLXIV|falai]])</sup>'' 14:01, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
# {{support}} (and no worries, Semper — non-WF Wiktionarians were going to nom him anyway). —[[User:Metaknowledge|Μετάknowledge]]<small><sup>''[[User talk:Metaknowledge|discuss]]/[[Special:Contributions/Metaknowledge|deeds]]''</sup></small> 05:07, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
# {{support}} (and no worries, Semper — non-WF Wiktionarians were going to nom him anyway). —[[User:Metaknowledge|Μετάknowledge]]<small><sup>''[[User talk:Metaknowledge|discuss]]/[[Special:Contributions/Metaknowledge|deeds]]''</sup></small> 05:07, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
# {{support}} on the condition that the nominated editor will lose admin rights if a confirmation vote does not achieve consensus for keeping admin rights; '''oppose''' to the extent the condition is not met. This is nothing personal; it is as a matter of general useful principle. --[[User:Dan Polansky|Dan Polansky]] ([[User talk:Dan Polansky|talk]]) 09:49, 8 June 2015 (UTC)


==== Oppose ====
==== Oppose ====

Revision as of 09:49, 8 June 2015

User:JohnC5 for admin

Support

  1. Support — I was going to start just such a vote today. This user is extremely helpful, produces truly top-notch entries, and is polite almost to a fault. He is becoming increasingly proficient in the use of modules; the ability to edit certain protected pages would be an asset to him and, as a result, the project. It should go without saying that he can be trusted with these tools. — I.S.M.E.T.A. 14:09, 6 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support. Likes etymologies and ancient languages. My kind of a Wiktionarian. --Vahag (talk) 14:16, 6 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Why not. --Z 15:28, 6 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  4. SupportUngoliant (falai) 14:01, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Support (and no worries, Semper — non-WF Wiktionarians were going to nom him anyway). —Μετάknowledgediscuss/deeds 05:07, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Support on the condition that the nominated editor will lose admin rights if a confirmation vote does not achieve consensus for keeping admin rights; oppose to the extent the condition is not met. This is nothing personal; it is as a matter of general useful principle. --Dan Polansky (talk) 09:49, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose

Abstain

Decision