Appendix talk:English idioms

From Wiktionary, the free dictionary
Latest comment: 6 years ago by Metaknowledge in topic RFD discussion: April–July 2018
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This should move to the Category:Idioms page, but let's clean it up (e.g., remove leading "a") here first.

Many entries here are not idioms

[edit]

Draft dodger is not an idiom.If you can discern the meaning from the literal common definitions of the words in the phrase you don't have an idiom.

Right. A draft dodger is someone who tries to avoid gusts of wind. No, wait. It's a baseball player the Dodgers have picked (should be capitalized, though). No, wait. It's a photographic manipulator one could hook up to a plow ... see WT:CFI for the call on this -dmh 15:38, 14 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

New List to be created

[edit]

I am about to create a separate page per each section of this list. They will be accessible at Wiktionary:List of idioms (*), where * represents a capital letter.

Namespace

[edit]

Belongs better at Appendix:English idioms

The following information passed a request for deletion.

This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.


Wiktionary:List of idioms

[edit]

This (and 26 subpages) should be moved to the appropriate namespace. --Connel MacKenzie 09:13, 9 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

It seems like a useful TODO/Request page, as the note at the top says. It should be retitled as such, since the "official", automatically updated page is the Category:Idioms. I'll start going through it removing items already tagged as idioms and ones not in "normal form" as described on CFI. -dmh 15:29, 23 January 2007 (UTC)Reply


See also

[edit]

"This page is being phased out."

[edit]

I hope this means moved or transformed somehow instead of removed. Could somebody kindly shed some light on this matter? Palosirkka (talk) 07:57, 12 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

Although I reference this page a lot, many idioms do not have verifiable sources... so regrettably that is probably the main reason for the phasing out... I assume it means removal, in the page itself, but certain idioms being incorporated in other fashions... (however, right or wrong explanations of idiomatic expressions; this page was very useful in my writing, and in my studies on literature.) 165.138.95.59 14:56, 3 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

RFD discussion: April–July 2018

[edit]

The following information has failed Wiktionary's deletion process (permalink).

It should not be re-entered without careful consideration.


So, this page has finally been phased out. All decent red links (and probably a whole bunch of crap ones too) were moved to Wiktionary:Requested entries (English). --Cien pies 6 (talk) 10:33, 7 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

This had a long edit history and lots of long lists that were copied elsewhere. Does that need to be kept for copyright purposes? -- Beland (talk) 22:57, 15 June 2018 (UTC)Reply
Copyright issues? Unlikely. --Harmonicaplayer (talk) 15:06, 16 June 2018 (UTC)Reply