Category talk:Wiktionary language considerations
Latest comment: 9 years ago by Angr in topic RFM discussion: January 2013–May 2014
The following discussion has been moved from Wiktionary:Requests for moves, mergers and splits.
This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.
Why fake the Wiktionary namespace in a category name? Seems a bit illogical to me. —Μετάknowledgediscuss/deeds 07:08, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
- I think it is useful for making clear that it is a category for Wiktionary-related things rather than lexical things. It's also common practice on Wikipedia I think. But we don't apply it very consistently right now. —CodeCat 14:17, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
- If we were to follow Wikipedia's practice, we would call it Category:Wiktionary language considerations rather than making it look like a namespace within a namespace. —Angr 15:46, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
- Category:Wiktionary language considerations is better. — Ungoliant (Falai) 14:38, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
- Sounds better to me too. ~ Röbin Liönheart (talk) 02:16, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
Done. All links have been switched to Category:Wiktionary language considerations. —Aɴɢʀ (talk) 14:20, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
