Talk:зубчатый
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This entry has survived Wiktionary's verification process (permalink).
Please do not re-nominate for verification without comprehensive reasons for doing so.
зубчатый (zubčatyj), ступенчатый (stupenčatyj), дымчатый (dymčatyj), решётчатый (rešótčatyj) and одностворчатый (odnostvorčatyj) are derived from зубец (zubec), ступенька (stupenʹka), дымка (dymka), решётка (rešótka), and створка (stvorka) respectively. I don’t see why can’t пильчатый (pilʹčatyj) and бревенчатый (brevenčatyj) be treated alike. Does somebody know better examples, if this suffix exists, as distinct from -атый (-atyj)? Guldrelokk (talk) 22:35, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
- Hello. I've fixed/added the etymologies of the terms you've mentioned here. But if -атый palatalises words like ступе́нька (→ ступе́нчатый), why doesn't it do it to рог (→ рога́тый)?
- Also, I don't understand your second-to-last sentence: "I don’t see why can’t пильчатый (pilʹčatyj) and бревенчатый (brevenčatyj) be treated alike". What do you mean by that?
- @Guldrelokk --Per utramque cavernam (talk) 09:24, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
- @Per utramque cavernam: Thank you. Sorry, I was trying to say that while решётчатый (rešótčatyj) is clearly a derivative of решётка (rešótka) – it doesn’t have anything to do with решето (rešeto), nor does зубчатый (zubčatyj) have anything to do with зуб (zub) – it doesn’t matter whether to consider пильчатый (pilʹčatyj) a derivative of пила (pila) or пилка (pilka), its straightforward diminutive with no peculiar senses.
- I have found, however, a few words, the most important of which is взрывчатый (vzryvčatyj), that must indeed contain -чатый (-čatyj) as a suffix, extracted from words like ступенчатый (stupenčatyj). I’ll add a couple and close RFV.
- Examples of -атый (-atyj) causing iotation where there can be no other suffix are внук (vnuk) → внучатый (vnučatyj), хлопок (xlopok) → хлопчатый (xlopčatyj), перепонка (pereponka) → перепончатый (perepončatyj). A counterexample is язык (jazyk) → языкатый (jazykatyj); this doesn’t seem predictable. Г, on the other hand, is never affected. Guldrelokk (talk) 10:08, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
RFV passed. Examples are now unambiguous. Guldrelokk (talk) 10:44, 23 April 2018 (UTC)