Talk:

From Wiktionary, the free dictionary
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Definitions[edit]

Why does the definition of this character not match that of its simplified form, ? 71.66.97.228 22:56, 29 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. The character is an unorthodox form of (俗字) of that existed before simplified characters were invented. Evidence can be found here [1] and here [2].
Note that the 通用規范漢字表 published by mainland China in 2013 does not assign any traditional Chinese character to . [3]
Despite its similarity in appearance (compare and ), there does not seem to be any relation between and . [4]
Evidence for as a variant form of is found in 《中文大辭典》. [5]
Evidence for as a variant form of is found in 《重訂直音篇》. [6]
Thank you and have a nice day. KevinUp (talk) 04:56, 9 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Discussion moved from User talk:KevinUp.

Although historically 叄 doesn't not mean 三 in particular, here's some evidence for 叄 as the financial form of 三: