Talk:炮火的洗禮

RFD discussion: June–August 2017

The following information passed a request for deletion (permalink).

This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.

---

炮火的洗禮, 炮火嘅洗禮

SOP. Handled by 洗禮.--2001:DA8:201:3512:E49E:3757:EDD0:9CB5 12:05, 13 June 2017 (UTC)

If it is used as English baptism by fire, it should be kept. I suggest sending this to RFV. — justin(r)leung _{{ (t...) | c=› }} 16:42, 13 June 2017 (UTC)

The English term is idiomatic does not mean the Chinese one is. baptism does not mean ordeal in English.--2001:DA8:201:3512:98C7:6612:A4DC:CF14 18:19, 13 June 2017 (UTC)

Sure, but there doesn't need to be any actual 炮火 involved, right? How is it SoP then? — justin(r)leung _{{ (t...) | c=› }} 18:23, 13 June 2017 (UTC)

I think this is idiomatic enough to be keepable. Wyang (talk) 09:05, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

Keep because it doesn't literally involve firing at Christians. —suzukaze (t・c) 14:33, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

• RFD kept: no consensus for deletion. --Dan Polansky (talk) 12:30, 20 August 2017 (UTC)