Talk:異用字

RFV discussion: March–October 2019

The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process (permalink).

Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.

---

異用字

Is there any use outside of/unrelated to 臺灣閩南語常用詞辭典? — justin(r)leung _{{ (t...) | c=› }} 07:34, 10 March 2019 (UTC)

The "臺灣教育部閩南語推薦用字 : Recommended Characters for the Hokkien Language" has the wording "異用字 Variant Forms" according to [1]. --Geographyinitiative (talk) 15:22, 14 March 2019 (UTC)

@Geographyinitiative: The choice of characters in 臺灣閩南語常用詞辭典 is based on 臺灣教育部閩南語推薦用字, so I'm not sure if they can be considered independent sources. — justin(r)leung _{{ (t...) | c=› }} 01:42, 9 April 2019 (UTC)

I don't know of any other place where this wording is used; it may be idiosyncratic. I assumed it was not because it was used in the context of a dictionary. --Geographyinitiative (talk) 01:45, 9 April 2019 (UTC)

Another example in 臺灣閩南語常用詞辭典: "蹛 ... 異用字 帶、滯" “Entry #12651”, in 教育部臺灣台語常用詞辭典 (overall work in Mandarin and Hokkien), Ministry of Education, R.O.C., 2024.--Geographyinitiative (talk) 12:00, 24 April 2019 (UTC)

@Geographyinitiative: That doesn't help. We need three independent sources. — justin(r)leung _{{ (t...) | c=› }} 15:50, 24 April 2019 (UTC)

• RFV failed due to lack of sources independent of 臺灣閩南語常用詞辭典. — justin(r)leung _{{ (t...) | c=› }} 03:36, 21 October 2019 (UTC)