Talk:-slovlje

@Embryomystic, Vorziblix, Crom daba: Isn't this a metanalysis of -slovlje? Shouldn't zvjezdoslovlje be parsed as zvjezdo- + -slovlje or zvijézda + -o- + -slovlje? It would be similar to -ology. --Barytonesis (talk) 23:29, 5 December 2017 (UTC)

Sounds reasonable to me. I tagged it mainly because -oslovlje already existed, and I figured I'd look more closely later. embryomystic (talk) 23:34, 5 December 2017 (UTC)

Yes, I’d definitely parse it as a combining form zvjezdo- (equivalent to zvijézda + -o-) of zvijézda suffixed with -slovlje. For what it's worth, it seems the most common convention in our existing Serbocroatian entries, as established by User:Ivan Štambuk back when he was active, was to just write e.g. zvijézda + -slovlje. — Vorziblix (talk · contribs) 00:59, 6 December 2017 (UTC)

@Embryomystic, Vorziblix: Ok, I went ahead and replaced -oslovlje with -slovlje. As for the interfix, I almost never use them anywhere, but I suppose they don't harm either. --Barytonesis (talk) 02:11, 6 December 2017 (UTC)