Talk:African Dingo

From Wiktionary, the free dictionary
Latest comment: 1 year ago by DCDuring in topic RFV discussion: December 2022–February 2023
Jump to navigation Jump to search

RFV discussion: December 2022–February 2023

[edit]

The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process (permalink).

Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.


This entry hath been bestowed unto us by A3A0, who is not particularly known for accuracy. That said, it's superficially plausible. I can find some hits for "African dingo/dingoes/dingos" on Google Books, but can we establish that it actually refers to the Basenji? For example, this book (which obviously doesn't treat the term as lexical due to the "some sort of") uses the phrase in reference to an entirely different species, the African wild dog. That said, I can find sources online that say Basenji is "also known as" the African dingo, but those are mentions. Minor point: should "Dingo" be capitalized? 70.172.194.25 23:13, 18 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

I can't think of a reason why "Dingo" or "Dog" should be capitalized in any of the synonyms listed at Basenji. Cf. African wild dog (as you mentioned), African elephant, African penguin, etc. Voltaigne (talk) 00:25, 19 December 2022 (UTC)Reply
Some books like to capitalize the names of creatures (Red-tailed Hawk, Red Oak, etc); this has caused many an edit-war on Wikipedia, but I think we can stick with lowercase as in the examples you name. - -sche (discuss) 03:25, 20 December 2022 (UTC)Reply
French Wiktionary includes a usage note in each entry for species names, stating that they can also be capitalized (without having a separate entry for capitalized forms). A usage note might be a bit much, but maybe there's some systematic way we can indicate this? Andrew Sheedy (talk) 23:15, 20 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Similar to the above. 70.172.194.25 23:16, 18 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Occurs in various issues of the magazine Modern Basenji, but none of those use it in a sentence. The plural form Ango Angaris, which we also have, doesn't seem to be attested at all except in this web page that is clearly auto-generated from a template [1] (compare [2], [3], etc.). 70.172.194.25 23:08, 23 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Similar to the above. 70.172.194.25 00:10, 19 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

RFV Failed. Ioaxxere (talk) 02:17, 9 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

For all of these? Did you personally try to find uses and come up empty handed, or are you just closing this because the required time has elapsed? I kinda had a suspicion that “African Dingo” might be salvageable, but wasn’t sure. In general, I think it would be a good idea to at least have one person other than the RfV-nominator confirm the inability/difficulty in citing a word before failing it. 70.172.194.25 02:21, 9 February 2023 (UTC)Reply
@Ioaxxere I greatly applaud your efforts to reduce the RfV backlog. But I kinda don’t want my personal inability to find a word to be the sole basis on which an entry is deleted. I’m not sure whether you are investigating all of these, since you’re going through them very quickly. If you are investigating, maybe you could leave a note like “Couldn’t find this either” alongside the RfV-failed message. If you’re not investigating the words, I guess the policy doesn’t say anything against that, but I’ll probably have to start using {{rfquote}} more instead of {{rfv}} for words I’m on the fence about. 70.172.194.25 02:41, 9 February 2023 (UTC)Reply
No, I haven't looked into any of the terms and seemingly no one else has either (for the last months). If you just want to find quotes, then rfquote seems like a better option. Ioaxxere (talk) 03:04, 9 February 2023 (UTC)Reply
I've looked, though I'm not usually chasing after cites for obscure aliases for dog breeds. I didn't look at UseNet or at the web as a whole. There probably are mentions at breed-lover sites. There might be uses there. DCDuring (talk) 16:32, 9 February 2023 (UTC)Reply