Talk:C.A.
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
The following information passed a request for deletion (permalink).
This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.
C.C.A.A.[edit]
Incorrect. Should be CA. --I learned some phrases (talk) 08:26, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
- Keep (if it exist). --QueeroDeera (talk) 14:11, 31 March 2019 (UTC)
- Keep This form exists, but according to the official Spanish punctuation rules, it needs an extra space: C. A. Also nominated, but probably valid: C.C.A.A. – Jberkel 17:08, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
- Keep if attestable. This should probably be sent to WT:RFVN. — justin(r)leung { (t...) | c=› } 06:48, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
- WT:RFVN is for checking the existence of CA, C.A., C. A.. If C.A. is incorrect or proscibed (according to whom? RAE?), but does exists nontheless, label it. For German, dots and spaces are prescribed (z. B.) (Duden), but z.B. ([1]) and zB. ([2]) can be found as well. Reasons why the proscribed forms are used, can be: it saves spaces and space; z.[smaller space and never a line break]B. which is more fitting can't be typed easily. --幽霊四 (talk) 10:38, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
- Keep if they are indeed attested, but maybe send to WT:RFVN. Imetsia (talk) 20:13, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
- RFD-kept. Imetsia (talk) 20:13, 25 July 2021 (UTC)