Talk:Carriage Paid To
Latest comment: 3 years ago by BD2412 in topic RFD discussion: November 2019–November 2020
The following information passed a request for deletion (permalink).
This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.
SOPpy Incoterm --Vealhurl (talk) 12:03, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
- Keep syntax of use not transparent. Object of to is a destination, not a payee. DCDuring (talk) 01:12, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
- Keep - Dentonius (talk) 12:58, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
Adding:
- Keep Syntax of use not transparent. Supposed to be followed by a place. DCDuring (talk) 01:12, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
- Keep - Dentonius (talk) 12:58, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
- Keep Syntax of use not transparent. Supposed to be followed by a place. DCDuring (talk) 01:12, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
- Keep - Dentonius (talk) 12:58, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
- Keep Not obvious what either component term means DCDuring (talk) 01:12, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
- Keep - Dentonius (talk) 12:58, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
- Delete all. It is sufficient that we have the abbreviations (CIP etc.). --Lambiam 14:17, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
- I agree. Equinox ◑ 15:26, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
- Delete all. Canonicalization (talk) 18:10, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
- These votes appear to be arbitrary expressions of dislike for commercial activity. Applying normal lexicographic tests should be how we determine inclusion. DCDuring (talk) 01:12, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
- Keep all per DCDuring. Andrew Sheedy (talk) 05:19, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
- In short, keep all - Dentonius (talk) 12:58, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
Kept as to all. bd2412 T 06:49, 20 November 2020 (UTC)