Talk:Marschitect

From Wiktionary, the free dictionary
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Marschitect relevancy[edit]

The term Marschitect has been coined by Founder and CEO of Mars City Design, Vera Mulyani, when describing architects that design structures and habitats for future Martian settlements. The term is mentioned in several articles featuring Ms. Mulyani and Mars City Design. Brahms1975 (talk) 21:48, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

With the growing interest and rapid plans for eventual Mars missions and settlement, in addition to the growing use of the word Marschitect in online publications I respectfully request a positive ruling in fact of including Marschitect in the Wiktionary. Thanks so much for your insightful comments and edits thus far, it is truly appreciated. Brahms1975 (talk) 02:27, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

RFV discussion: August–October 2016[edit]

The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process (permalink).

Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.


DTLHS (talk) 20:44, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The creator has commented at Talk:Marschitect. This is either a protologism or a "hot word". Equinox 21:53, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
It wasn't just made up by the person, unless that person just happens to be the newspaper reporter that created the only news source I found using the word. Several google hits for Marschitect, but none that I found durably archived. I found nothing in books. I found 1 news article mentioning the term in quotations. I found nothing in Groups. But this seems to be a hot word.
I say delete...for now. Honestly, this seems like a term that could be used more often later than it is now, since it's apparently a hot word. It's likely that in a few years, the term will be attested, but it is apparent that it is not attested now. Unless someone can find more durably archived sources with this term outside of the places I've already looked, I say we'd better trash this one, for now at least. Philmonte101 (talk) 22:17, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]