The following information passed a request for deletion.
This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.
- Was tagged by a Wonderfool sockpuppet which was indefinitely blocked before he could list it here. The thing is, it claims to be a common noun and a former trademark, so WT:BRAND wouldn't apply. Ergo, keep for lack of any reason to delete. Mglovesfun (talk) 11:35, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
- Seems reasonable. Keep. DAVilla 05:52, 17 November 2012 (UTC)
- Move to RFV for citations meeting WT:BRAND. The trademark may have expired, but that doesn't mean it's necessarily become a generic term in English. Equinox ◑ 13:13, 29 May 2013 (UTC)