Talk:V.next
Latest comment: 11 years ago by -sche in topic RFV discussion: September–November 2012
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/d/d5/TK_archive_icon.svg/55px-TK_archive_icon.svg.png)
The following discussion has been moved from Wiktionary:Requests for verification (permalink).
This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.
Completely unknown to me. -- Liliana • 11:46, 16 September 2012 (UTC)
- Also never heard of this, and the structure is dubious. There is not typically a dot between the 'v' for version and the number (though there might be within the version, e.g. "v2.0"). Equinox ◑ 23:17, 16 September 2012 (UTC)
- Difficult to find cites for this, I can't find a search string that filters out most of the false positives. There seems to be some evidence for usage on the internet, but is v.Next being used by Microsoft as a product name? This seem to imply that it is, and possibly also [1] and [2]. On the other hand they may be genuine usages, as might [3]. I only got one durably archived hit [4] but I didn't go through all the results - too difficult, too many false positives from variable names etc. SpinningSpark 14:50, 17 September 2012 (UTC)
- RFV-failed for now. - -sche (discuss) 01:44, 29 November 2012 (UTC)