# Talk:abaxial

## RFV discussion: April–July 2014[edit]

**The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process.**

Failure to be verified may either mean that this information is fabricated, or is merely beyond our resources to confirm. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.

Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.

Rfv-sense: Other dictionaries do not seem to have the mathematical sense. Therefore, three quotes would be called for. --Hekaheka (talk) 21:19, 21 April 2014 (UTC)

- [1], [2] and [3] are optical/astronomical cites. [4] was the only mathematical one I could find at quick notice. [5] is an abstract of a preprint (of an otherwise Chinese paper) that uses abaxial in the optical sense. [6] is another preprint with Chinese authors, this time in plasma physics. I'm going to say that if arXiv doesn't have mathematical documents using it, it's not in use, at least currently, in mathematics.--Prosfilaes (talk) 08:17, 22 April 2014 (UTC)
**Failed**. —*Ungoliant*23:51, 13 July 2014 (UTC)^{(falai)}