Talk:angúlos

RFD discussion: October 2017–January 2018

The following information has failed Wiktionary's deletion process (permalink).

It should not be re-entered without careful consideration.

---

Citations:angúlos

Do we want Citations of misspellings? --P5Nd2 (talk) 14:11, 30 October 2017 (UTC)

Would you rather have them polluting the citations page of correct spellings, or completely removed? — Ungoliant ^(falai) 14:29, 30 October 2017 (UTC)

Is it a misspelling or a typo? --Barytonesis (talk) 21:12, 31 October 2017 (UTC)

• I'd like to see it deleted --P5Nd2 (talk) 18:29, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
• P5Nd2 is Wonderfool. As for substance: when the misspelling has more quotations, it may be worth keeping in Citations: namespace; when only one can be found, probably not so much; I don't know. --Dan Polansky (talk) 16:39, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
• In general, citations of common misspellings can be useful. This is a one-off kind of mistake, so I'd delete it. —Μετάknowledge^{discuss/deeds} 17:32, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
• RFD failed. —Μετάknowledge^{discuss/deeds} 06:10, 7 January 2018 (UTC)