The following information passed a request for deletion.
This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.
I nominated a citation I moved into the entry for speedy deletion not so long ago and it got reverted. So I'm rfd-ing. Citation moved into entry where it's more visible. Do we want the same citation twice in two namespaces? Does that help anyone understand the word? Renard Migrant (talk) 18:35, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
- I don't know how others feel, but I am fine with all citations appearing on the citations page and select citations appearing on the main page as usage examples. - TheDaveRoss 03:07, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
- I agree with TheDaveRoss. It's fine to have the citations page have citations that are also in the main entry. --WikiTiki89 03:10, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
- Not see any appetite to delete this, please keep unless a bunch or deleters comes along. Renard Migrant (talk) 14:24, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
- Keep and expand. In an ideal future, every word in this dictionary will have a citations page with at least a handful of citations, including the earliest uses that can be found, a very recent example, and a handful in between. bd2412 T 01:34, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
- Keep per TheDaveRoss: it is okay for citation pages to be supersets of citations in the mainspace. --Dan Polansky (talk) 06:59, 23 April 2016 (UTC)