Talk:coerator
The following discussion has been moved from the page User talk:Mglovesfun.
This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.
Why do you remove coerator sister ??? Mag-Zen 15:30, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
- Because you made an absolute mess. You don't seem to know which language you're editing - is it Latin, or English? Mglovesfun (talk) 15:34, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
For Coerator is latin leave etymology & ipa prononciation please. And for English Curator you can deplace the english word to latin, rather than erase. Mag-Zen 15:39, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
- There is no etymology and the pronunciation is wrong, so why would I leave them? I'm not even sure q is used in IPA - should be /k/. Mglovesfun (talk) 15:40, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
Can i then add coerator related term in latin section of curator ??? Mag-Zen 15:44, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
- VULGAR [wulʒar] LATIN [laθin] Mag-Zen 15:50, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
- You can add them. Mglovesfun (talk) 15:51, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
Tʰanks ! Mag-Zen 15:53, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
- About phonetic [k] is modern pronounciation ancient used [q]... Mag-Zen 16:01, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
Can you please revert the coerator removed IPA ? Mag-Zen 16:19, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
Hi, what to do with ipa ? Mag-Zen 17:28, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
- Well, I still think it's wrong, but add it back and we'll let someone else decide. Mglovesfun (talk) 17:30, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
RFV discussion[edit]
The following discussion has been moved from Wiktionary:Requests for verification.
This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.
Note WT:RFV#Special:Contributions/Nemzag. I have gone through all of Nemzag's mainspace edits; most have been verified or corrected by other knowledgeable editors. A minority had never been edited by other editors, or had been edited but still seemed to me to have problems. In about half of those cases, I was able to verify or correct the information myself. Here, I list all of the words I could not verify myself. I'd prefer the input of knowledgeable editors to actual citations (but conferred with other editors and decided RFV was the best venue). — Beobach 01:03, 13 December 2010 (UTC)
Specifically, I doubt the pronunciation. I thought even the most educated Romans used only aspirated /tʰ/, not full-fledged /θ/. Correct me if I've misunderstood. — Beobach 01:03, 13 December 2010 (UTC)