Talk:corporate social responsibility
Latest comment: 11 years ago by TAKASUGI Shinji in topic corporate social responsibility
The following information has failed Wiktionary's deletion process.
It should not be re-entered without careful consideration.
Given that we have corporate and social responsibility, does this add value to the project? Not that this would necessarily destroy it either, but we seem to be expanding towards defining more and more "soppish" terms. --Hekaheka (talk) 13:42, 9 May 2012 (UTC)
- Keep. I didn't actually know there was a term for this, if I had been talking about it in speech I would probably have used some long periphrasis. It does look a bit soppish, but the fact that it is commonly abbreviated to CSR and that there is a Wikipedia article by this name makes me feel it's a specific term for a specific complex of ideas. Ƿidsiþ 14:07, 9 May 2012 (UTC)
- WP has entries for, and there are abbreviations of, loads and loads of things we don't want.—msh210℠ (talk) 17:59, 9 May 2012 (UTC)
- Delete. Our definition for this is precisely a paraphrase of ours for corportae and ours for social responsibility.—msh210℠ (talk) 17:59, 9 May 2012 (UTC)
- Delete SOP in classic form; Widsith makes some valid points, but that's simply not we work as of now. Perhaps we need a new way of looking at it (cf. the BP). --Μετάknowledgediscuss/deeds 04:32, 10 May 2012 (UTC)
- Since social responsibility exists, delete. Mglovesfun (talk) 14:56, 10 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted. — TAKASUGI Shinji (talk) 15:18, 15 August 2012 (UTC)