Talk:nicht zutreffend
Latest comment: 9 years ago by BD2412
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/0/03/Green_check.svg/55px-Green_check.svg.png)
The following information passed a request for deletion.
This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.
clear case of SoP -- Liliana • 22:00, 11 April 2015 (UTC)
- You obviously didn't look to see whether there is an entry for n. z., (not to be confused with NZ). But maybe not applicable should be allowable as a common term. Donnanz (talk) 08:35, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
- It's common but nothing more than the sum of its parts. Green grass is a common term, too. Renard Migrant (talk) 11:18, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
- @Donnanz: One could create the entry n. z. where it then could be "abbreviation of nicht zutreffend, but there's no need for the entry nicht zutreffend which is "SoP". 93.196.243.56 12:37, 1 June 2015 (UTC)
- It's common but nothing more than the sum of its parts. Green grass is a common term, too. Renard Migrant (talk) 11:18, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
- Keep: present in translation dictionaries. google:"nicht zutreffend" dictionary finds dict.cc[1], and bab.la[2] (has two senses as translations); further in Wörterbuch der Schmierungstechnik, Wörterbuch Maschinenbau und Tribologie, Langenscheidt Dictionary Technology and Applied Sciences. In the role of N/A, I wonder whether "nicht anwendbar" is used as well. Furthermore, I find uses of "nicht zutreffend" as "not true" or "not the case", which are quite distinct from N/A, making the use of "nicht zutreffend" for "not applicable" rather unobvious; one might argue that it is just polysemy at the level of "zutreffend", though. --Dan Polansky (talk) 09:43, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
No consensus to delete. bd2412 T 13:19, 14 August 2015 (UTC)