Talk:siilo

From Wiktionary, the free dictionary
Jump to navigation Jump to search

RFV discussion: November 2018–December 2019[edit]

The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process (permalink).

Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.


(Italian compound form) Grammatically correct but I'm struggling to find any actual usage. SemperBlotto (talk) 10:41, 21 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

The word siilo have the same use of the word mangialo and of the pages of conjugated forms of verbs and inflected/declinated forms of nouns and adjectives as completion of the related term pages. DelvecchioSimone12 5 96 (talk) 11:51, 21 November 2018 (UTC)Reply
The terms siilo, mangialo, dillo, dimmelo, dammelo, dallo, fallo, fammelo and similar terms (both only when used with verbal meanings) in italian are formed using the same derivation rule. DelvecchioSimone12 5 96 (talk) 17:56, 24 November 2018 (UTC)Reply
I am not sure I understand what you're saying, but the fact that it's regularly derived doesn't mean it doesn't have to be attested. That also holds for conjugated/declined forms, at least if there's any reason to doubt that that form must exist (e.g. uncountable nouns, intransitive verbs). RFV failed.__Gamren (talk) 21:52, 1 December 2019 (UTC)Reply