Talk:sit on it

From Wiktionary, the free dictionary
Latest comment: 12 years ago by Liliana-60 in topic sit on it
Jump to navigation Jump to search

The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process.

Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.


sit on it[edit]

This meaning seems to fail the independence criteria. It also has precluded the "delay by inaction" meaning by promoting an obsolete catch phrase. --Connel MacKenzie 21:12, 14 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

I'd be happy to put it the "delay by inaction" sense with a separate "etymology" and make the RfD an RfD-sense. Or do we have to wait out the RfD process? "Sit on it" is certainly an important idiom though few would fail to get the meaning from context, I think. DCDuring 22:09, 14 December 2007 (UTC)Reply
No need to wait...converting from full rfd to rfd-sense is perfectly fine for this, I'd think. --Connel MacKenzie 05:24, 24 December 2007 (UTC)Reply


The following information has failed Wiktionary's deletion process.

It should not be re-entered without careful consideration.


sit on it[edit]

Sense: To wait or delay. This seems to be sit on + it. DCDuring TALK 00:34, 11 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Yeah, redundant to {{&lit|sit on|it}}. --Mglovesfun (talk) 10:40, 11 July 2011 (UTC)Reply
The usage example should stay, I think, under the {{&lit}}. DCDuring TALK 11:26, 11 July 2011 (UTC)Reply
Agreed, but the first def would have to link sit on in addition to separate sit and on. DAVilla 05:51, 13 July 2011 (UTC)Reply
Good catch, thanks. I'll try to remember that in similar circumstances. DCDuring TALK 13:58, 13 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

deleted -- Liliana 18:02, 4 October 2011 (UTC)Reply