Talk:squame
Latest comment: 3 years ago by Kiwima in topic RFV discussion: April–May 2021
The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process (permalink).
Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.
I could only find two cites (as opposed to mentions). Hazarasp (parlement · werkis) 10:21, 7 April 2021 (UTC)
- @Hazarasp: Where are these two cites? At the very least, we need a link to them. It does not help for you to just make the assertion, you need to provide evidence. That way, someone only needs to find the third. Kiwima (talk) 20:51, 7 April 2021 (UTC)
- @Kiwima:; Sorry about that; I was running out of time. On further thought, there's probably just the one (for the variant squamme):
- Lua error in Module:quote at line 2930: Parameter "nocat" is not used by this template.
- By the way, the first quote you added seems to be Middle English; I've moved it to the ME entry. Hazarasp (parlement · werkis) 03:21, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
- @Kiwima:; Sorry about that; I was running out of time. On further thought, there's probably just the one (for the variant squamme):
RFV-failed Kiwima (talk) 21:39, 16 May 2021 (UTC)