Template talk:fi-form of
Latest comment: 12 years ago by Hekaheka in topic Some simplifications, please
Protected template
[edit]Is it in accordance with standard Wiktionary procedure to have a template such as this one protected? __meco 13:29, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
- Heavily linked templates are protected by default.--Jyril 21:18, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
- I find it unnecessary to have protection on other than the most important English conjugaion templates, so I posted a thread on WT:GP to have others' opinion about it. __meco 14:33, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
case= parameter
[edit]As added here - it breaks on usages such as on [[opasti]]. Categorization should be optional only when the parameter is non-empty. I abhor template language, so someone please fix this. --Ivan Štambuk 11:44, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
"the" suffix
[edit]Is "the" necessary before the word "suffix"? I think the definitions would look nicer without. --Hekaheka 06:43, 5 September 2011 (UTC)
Some simplifications, please
[edit]Hi. As for the verb forms, I'd suggest some changes that would make more sense and speed up the process if one wants to create pages manually.
- person: the text "first" would generate automatically the text "First-person", "second" -> "Second-person" and "third" -> "Third-person"
- mood: conditional and potential moods have only the present tense, so the text "conditional" would generate automatically the text "conditional present" and "potential" would generate "potential present"
Thanks! -- Frous 05:12, 2 December 2011 (UTC)
- Adding to this topic, the ways of indicating singular and plural could be more simple, e.g. "pl=s" for singular and "pl=p" for plural. --Hekaheka (talk) 05:02, 7 June 2012 (UTC)