[[Appendix:Proto-Indo-European/kh₂eyd-|*kh₂eyd-]]
I'm not sure what deleted entry you're actually referring to. In any case I didn't really look at who created it, and it's nothing personal. There's just a lot of bad etymological stuff around and it's hard to tell between usable stuff and junk. So I would rather err on the side of caution. I won't mind at all if you restore stuff I delete, as long as it's improved of course.
Cool, cool. Could I also ask, as you move inflected stems into the main root articles (e.g. *gʷʰer-), that you add the conjugation tables in with them? I think that they are useful and am sorry to see them disappear.
I'm wondering about that myself. The difficulty is that a root by itself doesn't have any kind of conjugation. But where else can we put it?
Yeah, I was wondering that myself. You could put it under each stem's bullet point; though, that would going against normal practices and divisions. You could also have an Inflection header with subsections for each stem. It's an interesting dilemma, but as I say, I'd still love to have the tables.
I thought ID was just for noobies. I've never actually read any discussions there.... Which would you suggest as the optimal location for this question?
Howdy, Code. Sorry about the Celtic stuff at *steh₂-. I am perfectly aware that Italo-Celtic is not completely accepted, and I've only used it twice in the past (here and in *bʰudʰmḗn) where the evidence for the proposal seems most convincing. As for the Goidelic/Brythonic business, I wish that had been told to me earlier. I've been using that schema for a little while now because I find it clear; though I take your point about OI being the only Goidelic language. And with Brythonic, I was just using Wikipedia's standard, which created the error. Oops.