Question re: unattested forms of determiners

Fragment of a discussion from User talk:Rua
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Adding to that, should πŒΉπ„πŒ° (ita) (it) and πƒπŒΉ (si) be their own lemmata or link as forms to πŒΉπƒ (is)?

β€” Kleio (t Β· c)β€Ž01:30, 8 May 2016

The feminine and neuter forms should probably link to the masculine form, as they form a single paradigm that is clearly similar to that of adjectives. I think the first and second person pronouns should be kept separate though. Some people treat the singular (I) and plural (we) as part of one lemma, but I don't know if that makes sense.

We shouldn't have entries for unattested forms, at least that's the norm we've stuck with for Gothic. I deleted the entry.

β€”CodeCatβ€Ž01:34, 8 May 2016