User:Geographyinitiative/Wiktionary:Entry Assessment

Assements of Entrys/Senses
A page for developing a scheme for assessing entries/senses

Likely Passes WT:ATTEST ("Validity Verified")

These entries/senses likely pass WT:ATTEST.

Authoritative Quality

• Has Authoritative References; Has Ten Independent Cites with confirmed OCLC
• Beijing, Chungking, Taipei

Good Quality

• Has Five Independent Cites with confirmed OCLC
• Chungnanhai

Basic Valid

• Likely meets bare minimum of OCLC cites to prevent failure at RFV
• Tsao-yang, Tsao-chuang, Zawa, Zengdu, Chapei, Chang-chia-k'ou, Kalgan, Zhangwan, Jhangjhou, Zhangzi, Ch'ang-tzu, Zhanhe

Poor Coverage ("Validity Unverified")

At this time, these entries/senses would be assumed to pass WT:ATTEST by "clearly widespread use". If they fail to appear in Google N-grams, should be considered for RFV.

Weak Pass

• May have enough material to pass two week discussion
• Tsaochuang

Approx 2 Valid Cites

• Close to Valid
• Tsaoyang, Zezhou, Zhangzhou

Approx 1 Valid Cites

• Nascent
• Zangguy, Zaozhuang, Zhabei, Zhang, Zhangjiaji, Zhangjiajie, Zhangjiakou, Changkiakow, Zhangpu, Zhangqiao, Zhangye

Approx 0 Valid Cites

• Skeletal
• Zaoyang, Chang