User talk:173.206.18.44

Appendix:Variations

Hello. It's nice to create these, but maybe it could be done by a bot, or automated process, which would check all the existing entries for similar spellings. Why not talk about it on WT:GP? I don't like to see valuable human time wasted on robotic tasks, when you could be doing things that really require human skill, like writing definitions, or choosing the correct translations. Equinox ◑ 00:39, 12 September 2023 (UTC)

+ templates

Please use + templates on Slavic languages. Vininn126 (talk) 15:46, 16 September 2023 (UTC)

What is this "request" I'm supposedly ignoring and that requires blocking? You're abusing your privileges and if anyone should be blocked it's you. 173.206.18.44 15:48, 16 September 2023 (UTC)

I unblocked - I confused you with a different user who recently was being disruptive, sorry about that. Vininn126 (talk) 15:49, 16 September 2023 (UTC)

I see, sorry then. 173.206.18.44 15:50, 16 September 2023 (UTC)

Likewise. Still, I ask that templates such as {{bor+}}, {{inh+}} be used instead of From {{inh}}. Also if there's a dercat there's less of a need to link an older stage of a word as dercat adds the category. Vininn126 (talk) 15:53, 16 September 2023 (UTC)

It only adds the category... I don't understand how readers are supposed to find the Proto-Slavic forms if they're not linked? I think readers would prefer to have the older stages easy to find, not obscured. 173.206.18.44 16:00, 16 September 2023 (UTC)

Personally I think that if the link to the PS form isn't there, then yeah that makes sense. Once the Old Polish term is added then that should be the main link. Vininn126 (talk) 16:09, 16 September 2023 (UTC)