Thesaurus talk:moon of Uranus
Latest comment: 7 years ago by Gamren in topic RFDO discussion: April 2015–December 2016
The following discussion has been moved from Wiktionary:Requests for deletion/Others (permalink).
This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.
Wikisaurus:moon of Haumea[edit]
Wikisaurus:moon of Jupiter[edit]
Wikisaurus:moon of Mars[edit]
Wikisaurus:moon of Saturn[edit]
Wikisaurus:moon of Neptune[edit]
Wikisaurus:moon of Pluto[edit]
None of these pages lists a single synonym! The content that they contain is already included both in the subcategories of Category:en:Moons (Category:en:Moons of Jupiter etc), which are easier to maintain, and in the list templates (template:list:moons of Haumea/en etc). These Wikisaurus pages all seem to be unused (not linked to from mainspace). Smurrayinchester (talk) 12:39, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
- It does not matter that they do not list synonyms. Wikisaurus is about all semantic relations. E.g. Wikisaurus:bird is perfectly fine regardless of hosting almost no synonyms. And an overlap with categories is not a reason for deletion of a Wikisaurus entry. As for the moon pages, I abstain. --Dan Polansky (talk) 20:51, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
- Abstain as the creator of all these pages, I don't particularly care if they survive or not in the Wikisaurus. But in any event, maybe these lists could be kept in appendices. --Daniel 07:58, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
- Delete per nom
; use list templates (template:list:moons of Haumea/en, etc).- -sche (discuss) 06:39, 26 May 2015 (UTC)- Eh, list templates are also stupid for those which only have a few moons. Just spell them out. - -sche (discuss) 08:52, 2 August 2015 (UTC)
- I've deleted [[Wikisaurus:moon of Haumea]] and [[template:list:moons of Haumea/en]], which only listed two moons; as noted above, other methods (such as categories and simple inclusion of the content in entries) is better for such cases. - -sche (discuss) 18:16, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
- Delete as too granual and non-atomic for the theasaurus; switched from abstain. I copied the content of the nominated pages to WS:moon; they can now be all deleted. --Dan Polansky (talk) 08:17, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted the rest, as noone has expressed desire to keep.__Gamren (talk) 15:18, 15 December 2016 (UTC)