Talk:Opportunity

RFD discussion: February–April 2019

The following information has failed Wiktionary's deletion process (permalink).

It should not be re-entered without careful consideration.

---

Opportunity

Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter

2001 Mars Odyssey

Do we want this? Per utramque cavernam 22:00, 28 February 2019 (UTC)

If there isn't an entry for Voyager, why would there be for any of these? -Mike (talk) 20:19, 4 March 2019 (UTC)

Delete all. Material for Wikipedia. Equinox ◑ 20:22, 4 March 2019 (UTC)

Delete all. Vast numbers of things like ships, trains and even tunnel-boring machines have names that are used in CFI-compliant sources. I don't see a clear way to include this and exclude all the others. Chuck Entz (talk) 04:29, 5 March 2019 (UTC)

Delete all. Encyclopedic. ---> Tooironic (talk) 02:21, 9 March 2019 (UTC)

Delete; compare Talk:Mars ascent vehicle, Talk:Mars Science Laboratory which were also deleted. - -sche (discuss) 21:09, 28 March 2019 (UTC)

Abstain. The policy is WT:NSE, allowing editor discretion. Multi-word names of vehicles seem more deletion-worthy to me than some other names of specific entities. Opportunity is a single word but there is nothing peculiarly interesting it, given it is a capitalized version of opportunity. On the other hand, Titanic is a capitalized version of titanic, and is also a name of a vehicle. --Dan Polansky (talk) 11:26, 29 March 2019 (UTC)

• RFD failed. —Μετάknowledge^{discuss/deeds} 22:32, 14 April 2019 (UTC)