부아: Revision history

19 August 2023

• curprev 19:3319:33, 19 August 2023‎ AutoDooz talk contribs‎ m 3,950 bytes 0‎ →‎Korean:Noun: sense1 sorted bylines; sense2 sorted bylines undo

18 August 2023

• curprev 04:4304:43, 18 August 2023‎ WingerBot talk contribs‎ m 3,950 bytes −36‎ convert {{lang}} wrapping in author= in {{quote-book}} to ko:...; convert {{lang}} wrapping in publisher= in {{quote-book}} to ko:...; convert {{lang}} wrapping in title= in {{quote-book}} to ko:...; convert {{lang}} wrapping in author= in {{quote-book}} to ko:...; convert {{lang}} wrapping in publisher= in {{quote-book}} to ko:...; convert {{lang}} wrapping in title= in {{quote-book}} to ko:...; convert {{lang}} wrapping in work= in {{quote-web}} to ko:... (with cleanup (manually assisted)) undo

27 August 2022

• curprev 23:5323:53, 27 August 2022‎ WingerBot talk contribs‎ m 3,986 bytes −1‎ remove extraneous spaces at end of line undo

14 October 2021

• curprev 00:3800:38, 14 October 2021‎ 350bot talk contribs‎ m 3,987 bytes +1‎ 소리-이다 undo

29 August 2021

• curprev 06:1806:18, 29 August 2021‎ 350bot talk contribs‎ m 3,986 bytes +3‎ 부아-가 치밀더라.◆하나-도 예외 ◆부아-도 늙는다. undo

17 August 2021

• curprev 05:4305:43, 17 August 2021‎ 350bot talk contribs‎ m 3,983 bytes +15‎ 네-들-이 씨불이는 ◆우리말-의 경우는 ◆의미-를 가진 ◆소리-들-이 하나도 ◆폐-에서 내뿜는 ◆기류-를 이용하여 ◆운동-을 하는 ◆사람-의 폐활량이 ◆세-에 가장 ◆폐활량-이 제일 ◆정도-에 20~30% ◆경우-는 언어학적 ◆폐활량-이 보통 undo

11 April 2021

• curprev 11:2111:21, 11 April 2021‎ Omgtw15 talk contribs‎ 3,968 bytes +5‎ No edit summary undo
• curprev 11:2011:20, 11 April 2021‎ Omgtw15 talk contribs‎ 3,963 bytes −94‎ No edit summary undo

6 February 2021

• curprev 01:5201:52, 6 February 2021‎ Marlin Setia1 talk contribs‎ m 4,057 bytes +1‎ →‎Usage notes undo

5 February 2021

• curprev 04:1004:10, 5 February 2021‎ LoutK talk contribs‎ 4,056 bytes +430‎ No edit summary undo

10 November 2020

• curprev 04:2704:27, 10 November 2020‎ B2V22BHARAT talk contribs‎ 3,626 bytes +73‎ No edit summary undo

24 October 2020

• curprev 02:4902:49, 24 October 2020‎ B2V22BHARAT talk contribs‎ 3,553 bytes +1‎ No edit summary undo

23 October 2020

• curprev 23:2823:28, 23 October 2020‎ 49.179.157.219 talk‎ 3,552 bytes −459‎ not an actual usage example undo
• curprev 16:4016:40, 23 October 2020‎ B2V22BHARAT talk contribs‎ 4,011 bytes −1,322‎ No edit summary undo

22 October 2020

• curprev 14:5814:58, 22 October 2020‎ B2V22BHARAT talk contribs‎ 5,333 bytes −161‎ I think archaic is correct because I never used 바른손 as right hand in my life. Same with 부아. undo
• curprev 14:3414:34, 22 October 2020‎ B2V22BHARAT talk contribs‎ 5,494 bytes 0‎ →‎Noun undo
• curprev 14:3114:31, 22 October 2020‎ B2V22BHARAT talk contribs‎ 5,494 bytes +2‎ Oops. You're right. Thanks. I'm not native English speaker, so.. undo
• curprev 14:2914:29, 22 October 2020‎ B2V22BHARAT talk contribs‎ 5,492 bytes +31‎ It's not my idea. http://www.jbnews.com/news/articleView.html?idxno=100600, https://blog.naver.com/uninote1/100029121266, https://news.mt.co.kr/mtview.php?no=2010040211398115430&outlink=1&ref=https%3A%2F%2Fsearch.naver.com undo
• curprev 14:2414:24, 22 October 2020‎ J3133 talk contribs‎ 5,461 bytes +163‎ No edit summary undo
• curprev 14:2314:23, 22 October 2020‎ Karaeng Matoaya talk contribs‎ 5,298 bytes +76‎ "pure korean" is not idomatic english and i dont know why you keep trying to make the usage notes overlap with the definitions section. the point of this usage note is to point out that it's not interchangeable with 분노 or 화 because it's limited to idiomatic expressions. undo
• curprev 14:2114:21, 22 October 2020‎ Karaeng Matoaya talk contribs‎ 5,222 bytes +1‎ No edit summary undo
• curprev 14:1714:17, 22 October 2020‎ B2V22BHARAT talk contribs‎ 5,221 bytes +129‎ No edit summary undo
• curprev 14:1514:15, 22 October 2020‎ B2V22BHARAT talk contribs‎ 5,092 bytes −125‎ 뇌피셜. undo
• curprev 11:5311:53, 22 October 2020‎ B2V22BHARAT talk contribs‎ 5,217 bytes +815‎ I can't agree with you. Please bring the issue to Beer Parlor and let's vote whether 부아 is a archaic or dated term. undo Tag: Undo
• curprev 11:5111:51, 22 October 2020‎ B2V22BHARAT talk contribs‎ 4,402 bytes −52‎ No edit summary undo
• curprev 11:5111:51, 22 October 2020‎ Karaeng Matoaya talk contribs‎ 4,454 bytes −815‎ Undo revision 60900508 by B2V22BHARAT (talk) because the citation doesn't support the definition provided, not any more than an article saying "cloud" comes from a word meaning "boulder" would mean that "boulder" should be added as a non-obsolete definition of "cloud". undo Tag: Undo
• curprev 11:4311:43, 22 October 2020‎ B2V22BHARAT talk contribs‎ 5,269 bytes +815‎ But why do you erase my reference? undo Tag: Undo
• curprev 11:3911:39, 22 October 2020‎ Karaeng Matoaya talk contribs‎ 4,454 bytes −815‎ Undo revision 60900453 by B2V22BHARAT (talk) no, this is a description of the etymology for definition 1, the same thing we have in our own etymology section of this article. "분한 마음이 울컥 솟아나는 것을 “부아가 치민다.”라고 하는데, 이는 부아 곧 폐가 부풀어 올라 가슴이 꽉 막히도록 화가 가득 찬 느낌을 표현한 말이다." the fact that this needs to be spelled out in an article like that it itself testimony to the fact that this word is not generally understood. undo
• curprev 11:3711:37, 22 October 2020‎ B2V22BHARAT talk contribs‎ 5,269 bytes +1‎ Archaic: No longer in general use, but still found in some contemporary texts that aim for an antique style, like "historical novels" or "Bible translations". How can 부아 that should only appear in historical novels and Bible translations appear this frequently in internet articles? undo
• curprev 11:3111:31, 22 October 2020‎ B2V22BHARAT talk contribs‎ 5,268 bytes +815‎ See this example: 부아가 치민다, 부아를 돋구다. 부아 means lung in this sentence, too. Therefore, the lung sense is not archaic.. It's just dated.. undo
• curprev 11:0911:09, 22 October 2020‎ B2V22BHARAT talk contribs‎ 4,453 bytes +912‎ Okay Okay.. Calm down.. I'll try to find the reference. Let's leave it as archaic for now. undo
• curprev 11:0211:02, 22 October 2020‎ Karaeng Matoaya talk contribs‎ 3,541 bytes −910‎ Undo revision 60900258 by B2V22BHARAT (talk) yes, and to show that it's only dated and not archaic, you should bring citations of people using it, not just saying what its definition is, which this one is not. try finding citations of use, along the lines of the 권오기 one you added. your second reference is outright deceptive: the article says "부아는 '노엽거나 분한 마음'이란 뜻입니다", and 허파 is also sometimes used in this context, which is the ref. undo Tag: Manual revert
• curprev 11:0011:00, 22 October 2020‎ B2V22BHARAT talk contribs‎ 4,451 bytes +499‎ No sign of archaic. Wait I'll bring more reference. undo
• curprev 10:5310:53, 22 October 2020‎ B2V22BHARAT talk contribs‎ 3,952 bytes +411‎ I'm talking about whether 부아 is archaic or dated, not what to include in Wiktionary. https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Wiktionary:Obsolete_and_archaic_terms Wait. I'll bring more reference. undo Tag: Undo
• curprev 10:4810:48, 22 October 2020‎ Karaeng Matoaya talk contribs‎ 3,541 bytes −411‎ Undo revision 60900226 by B2V22BHARAT (talk) see WT:CFI again. this is a mention, not a use. all examples of 부아 i could find in blogs were of this nature. undo Tag: Undo
• curprev 10:4610:46, 22 October 2020‎ B2V22BHARAT talk contribs‎ 3,952 bytes +411‎ As you can see, 부아 is frequently used as a term for lung in internet articles. Therefore, archaic(only spotted in Bible) is not applicable to 부아. undo
• curprev 09:0409:04, 22 October 2020‎ Karaeng Matoaya talk contribs‎ 3,541 bytes +164‎ User:B2V22BHARAT this is certainly not dated unless you can somehow add a lot more citations of usage as "lung" to add to this page. see Appendix:Glossary#Dated; an example is "gay" as "happy", which is very different in degree of obsoleteness from 부아 here. in korean, 하소서체 (never really used but understood generally) would be an example of dated usage. undo Tag: Manual revert
• curprev 03:0603:06, 22 October 2020‎ B2V22BHARAT talk contribs‎ 3,377 bytes −13‎ No edit summary undo
• curprev 02:5602:56, 22 October 2020‎ B2V22BHARAT talk contribs‎ 3,390 bytes −3‎ No edit summary undo
• curprev 02:5002:50, 22 October 2020‎ B2V22BHARAT talk contribs‎ 3,393 bytes −148‎ It's not a semantic shift. 부아 has lung meaning. undo

21 October 2020

• curprev 11:1711:17, 21 October 2020‎ 49.179.157.219 talk‎ 3,541 bytes +70‎ more derived terms undo
• curprev 11:1011:10, 21 October 2020‎ Karaeng Matoaya talk contribs‎ 3,471 bytes +12‎ →‎Etymology undo
• curprev 11:0311:03, 21 October 2020‎ 49.179.157.219 talk‎ 3,459 bytes +18‎ modify translation undo
• curprev 11:0111:01, 21 October 2020‎ Karaeng Matoaya talk contribs‎ 3,441 bytes +25‎ No edit summary undo
• curprev 10:5710:57, 21 October 2020‎ Karaeng Matoaya talk contribs‎ 3,416 bytes −10‎ →‎Usage notes: User:B2V22BHARAT i'll give you this, it's not obsolete undo
• curprev 10:5410:54, 21 October 2020‎ B2V22BHARAT talk contribs‎ 3,426 bytes +805‎ Reference: http://www.kwnews.co.kr/nview.asp?aid=220101400010 undo
• curprev 10:3910:39, 21 October 2020‎ Karaeng Matoaya talk contribs‎ 2,621 bytes −32‎ →‎References undo
• curprev 10:3910:39, 21 October 2020‎ Karaeng Matoaya talk contribs‎ 2,653 bytes −359‎ →‎Usage notes: this is covered by the usage note and even in academia 부아 appears only in compounds relating to linguistics, so the usage note ("almost never used in isolation") stands even in that context undo
• curprev 10:3510:35, 21 October 2020‎ Karaeng Matoaya talk contribs‎ 3,012 bytes −1‎ →‎Noun: us-exs are not collapsed but quotations from external sources are. see e.g. life#Noun. undo
• curprev 10:3510:35, 21 October 2020‎ Karaeng Matoaya talk contribs‎ 3,013 bytes +5‎ again, "obsolete or as translation of "pulmonic" in phonology" means that it is not obsolete as a translation of 'pulmonic', but is obsolete in all other situations. so your citing 부아="pulmonic" as evidence of this word not being obsolete doesn't matter, because that is already covered by the usage note. i have reworded this for clarity. i will concede "obsolete" if you can find examples of 부아 that is not being used outside this narrow field but as a general word for "lung". undo