Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2015-12/EL introduction

EL introduction

Voting on: Adding some text as the introduction to WT:EL (diff):

This is a list of norms that govern how an entry should be formatted. This includes what sections are allowed and what contents are expected to be found in them. These rules reflect what editors think as best concerning the standard format of an entry.

References

Rationale and changes:

• Quickly states that WT:EL is and what it does, for those unacquainted with the policy.
• The first sentence was based on WT:NORM's "This is a list of aspects that govern how the wiki code behind an entry should be formatted."
• The second sentence is a generic, all-encompassing statement but it also suggests that we have some standards concerning specific allowable headers and contents.
• The third sentence was based on WT:NORM's "[...] they do make the pages conform more to a standard format reflecting what we think of as best for the wiki code."

Schedule:

• Vote starts: 00:00, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
• Vote ends: 23:59, 23 February 2016 (UTC)

• Vote created: --Daniel Carrero (talk) 10:30, 17 December 2015 (UTC)

Discussion:

• Wiktionary:Beer parlour/2015/December#WT:EL new votes
• Wiktionary talk:Votes/pl-2015-12/EL introduction

Support

1. Support --Daniel Carrero (talk) 13:24, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
2. Support — Andrew Sheedy (talk) 02:07, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
3. Support --Droigheann (talk) 01:57, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
4. Support —Aɴɢʀ (talk) 09:44, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
5. Support but I would prefer "what sections are allowed" rather than "what are allowed sections" and "what contents are expected to be found" rather than "what are the contents expected to be found". --WikiTiki89 16:49, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
   • @Daniel Carrero, Andrew Sheedy, Droigheann, Angr Would you object to Wikitiki89's proposed edits being made to the vote text? This, that and the other (talk) 00:10, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

     Fine by me. --Daniel Carrero (talk) 00:11, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

     I would not. Andrew Sheedy (talk) 00:45, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

     I have no objection. —Aɴɢʀ (talk) 06:38, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

     Sure, go ahead 👍. --Droigheann (talk) 15:41, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

     Done, thanks. This, that and the other (talk) 00:52, 11 February 2016 (UTC)