Talk:不可侵犯

"不可侵犯" is obviously sum of parts. "神圣不可侵犯" may be considered a set phrase. Wyang (talk) 03:28, 8 April 2013 (UTC)

It's in Cedic dictionary, a back translation target and a demo on how to form words of "im-/in-/un-...able" type in Chinese, like 不可思议, 不可限量, etc.

If you think "神圣不可侵犯" is idiomatic, do you want me create that one from the history of this entry?

BTW, would you consider "神秘古怪" idiomatic or SoP? --Anatoli ^{(обсудить}/^вклад) 03:37, 8 April 2013 (UTC)

Just checked my Pleco dictionary, "不可侵犯" is there but "神圣不可侵犯" is not but if found "神圣不可侵犯" in Nciku. Will create that one as well. --Anatoli ^{(обсудить}/^вклад) 03:42, 8 April 2013 (UTC)

不可思议 and 不可限量 are idioms. With 不可侵..., one can also say 不可侵略 - uninvadable, 不可侵入 - unintrudable, 不可侵占 - unseizable, 不可侵掠 - uninvadable ... "神秘古怪" is sum of parts. Wyang (talk) 03:46, 8 April 2013 (UTC)

Thanks, restored the entry 神圣不可侵犯 with a fix (split trad/simp), please check if the translation is correct, I left what was there before. Nciku simply says "sacred". I would used "sacred/divine and inviolable". The terms you listed merit an entry, IMHO but they are not high priority, if we still lack many basic Chinese words and many single character, high frequency word entries are in a rather poor state. --Anatoli ^{(обсудить}/^вклад) 03:53, 8 April 2013 (UTC)

Oh, I see you did it already. Looks much better now. --Anatoli ^{(обсудить}/^вклад) 03:55, 8 April 2013 (UTC)