Talk:得很

From Wiktionary, the free dictionary
Jump to navigation Jump to search

RFD discussion: January–July 2019[edit]

The following discussion has been moved from Wiktionary:Requests for deletion (permalink).

This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.


Nominated by @Geographyinitiative:

I consider this obvious SoP; this is a complement phrase (补语短语); 得多 and 得好 are similar constructions; 得很 does not appear as a word in the Chinese dictionaries 现代汉语词典7, 现代汉语规范词典3, 教育部國語辭典簡編本, or 教育部重編國語辭典修訂本; such a commonly used construction could not have been accidentally skipped- it was skipped because it is not a word

Suzukaze-c 06:42, 24 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

[moved from Wiktionary:Requests for deletion/English]
Please note 得很 dehen is in the Taiwan TOCFL vocab. list. For those studying for and taking TOCFL tests its useful to keep dehen. It appears in 進階級, line 234. — This unsigned comment was added by 185.41.231.203 (talk).
I see it in the list there. I guess it could be a word? --Geographyinitiative (talk) 11:48, 24 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
It's not necessarily a "word", but a phrase that merits inclusion IMO. 很 is an adverb, which makes it an unusual complement for 得. — justin(r)leung (t...) | c=› } 06:59, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: While this sequence of characters does occur sometimes in text, the 很 does not necessarily modify 得. For example, take the sentence "他喜欢吃西瓜,吃得很多。" (He likes to eat watermelon, [he] eats very much.) In this excerpt, 很 unarguably modifies 多, not 得. In Chinese, 得 (de, neutral tone) doesn't mean anything on its own. It simply exists as a particle to separate verbs and adverbs. 很 is an adverb that describes adjectives and other adverbs, but not particles like 得. Personally, I haven't seen it in text myself, but I'll believe 185.41.231.203 that it occurs on the Taiwanese TOCFL vocab list. Can someone please confirm this? Johnny Shiz (talk) 22:57, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
We are not talking about this kind of incorrect parsing; the entry has examples to show how it's used. As Geographyinitiative has said, it is in the TOCFL vocab list (specifically 進階級). — justin(r)leung (t...) | c=› } 08:42, 7 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

{{look|nocat=y}}