Talk:A Christmas Carol
RFV discussion
[edit]The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process.
Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.
I'm no longer sure what standard applies. Do citations of the form "the A Christmas Carol of" suffice, as DAVilla has averred ? Is any verification required? Possible? DCDuring TALK 20:52, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
- The definition is enyclopedic, not to mention POV - "A novella written in 1843 by Charles Dickens about the ideological, ethical, and emotional transformations of Ebenezer Scrooge that result from visits of ghosts." - This is a literary interpretation, not a definition of a word/expression. ---> Tooironic 21:42, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
- Wow, Wiktionary has become very stupid lately. Equinox ◑ 18:29, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
Failed, deleted.—msh210℠ (talk) 19:18, 23 February 2011 (UTC)