Talk:Austrick

From Wiktionary, the free dictionary
Jump to navigation Jump to search

RFV discussion: November 2020–January 2022[edit]

The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process (permalink).

Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.

Untrustworthy Scots entries

See also Wiktionary:Beer_parlour/2020/November#Attestation_of_Scots.

Austrick[edit]

RFV failed Vox Sciurorum (talk) 10:26, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Buryatie[edit]

RFV failed (admin please delete)

Californie[edit]

RFV failed

Cambodie[edit]

RFV failed (admin please delete)

Cape Toun[edit]

RFV failed (admin please delete)

Chechnie[edit]

RFV failed

Chuvashie[edit]

RFV failed

Egyp[edit]

RFV failed Vox Sciurorum (talk) 10:26, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Guatemala Ceety[edit]

RFV failed Vox Sciurorum (talk) 10:26, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indonesie[edit]

RFV failed Vox Sciurorum (talk) 10:26, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ingushetie[edit]

RFV failed Vox Sciurorum (talk) 10:26, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kabardino-Balkarie[edit]

RFV failed Vox Sciurorum (talk) 10:26, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kalmykie[edit]

RFV failed Vox Sciurorum (talk) 10:26, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Karachay-Cherkessie[edit]

RFV-failed. Vox Sciurorum (talk) 10:19, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Karelie[edit]

RFV failed Vox Sciurorum (talk) 10:26, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kenyae[edit]

RFV failed Vox Sciurorum (talk) 10:26, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Latvie[edit]

RFV failed Vox Sciurorum (talk) 10:26, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Maurs[edit]

RFV failed Vox Sciurorum (talk) 10:26, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Mongolie[edit]

RFV failed Vox Sciurorum (talk) 10:26, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nigerie[edit]

RFV failed Vox Sciurorum (talk) 10:26, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

North Ossetie-Alanie[edit]

RFV failed Vox Sciurorum (talk) 10:26, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

North Rhine-Westphalie[edit]

RFV failed Vox Sciurorum (talk) 10:26, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Panama Ceety[edit]

RFV failed

Romanie[edit]

RFV failed Vox Sciurorum (talk) 10:26, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sirie[edit]

RFV failed

Slovakie[edit]

RFV failed Vox Sciurorum (talk) 10:26, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Slovenie[edit]

RFV failed Vox Sciurorum (talk) 10:26, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sooth Carolina[edit]

RFV failed Vox Sciurorum (talk) 10:26, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sooth Dakota[edit]

RFV failed Vox Sciurorum (talk) 10:26, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Udmurtie[edit]

RFV failed Vox Sciurorum (talk) 10:26, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unitit States[edit]

RFV failed Vox Sciurorum (talk) 10:26, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

aurie[edit]

RFV failed

caipital[edit]

RFV failed Vox Sciurorum (talk) 10:26, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

naition[edit]

Scots words added by somebody who doesn't know Scots. No obvious trustworthy Scots hits in a web search. Vox Sciurorum (talk) 17:17, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • I am marking some of these with the Middle Scots label if I can find one pre-1700 use. I assume one pre-1700 use is enough for Middle Scots. If not, it will fail RFV. Evidence of modern use is welcome, otherwise the RFV should be resolved without deleting the entry. So far, unitit, Egyp, Libie. Vox Sciurorum (talk) 20:14, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    @Vox Sciurorum: if I'm not mistaken, Middle Scots is classified under Middle English on Wiktionary. (see Category:Middle Scots) Thadh (talk) 20:38, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    @Thadh: {{lb|sco|Middle Scots}} adds the term to the Middle Scots category. With language code enm the Middle Scots label is not recognized as special. The category description reads "This category contains Middle Scots: terms or senses in Middle English as spoken in Scotland from c. 1450 to 1700." That is after the end of Middle English. The wording should be changed to "terms or senses descended from Middle English, as spoken in Scotland from c. 1450 to 1700". Vox Sciurorum (talk) 20:49, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    CAT:Middle Scots, however, is a subcategory of CAT:Scottish Middle English, not of CAT:Scots language, and Module:etymology languages/data lists its parent as enm, not sco. And while {{lb|enm|Middle Scots}} doesn't add a category, {{lb|enm|Scotland}} adds CAT:Scottish Middle English, a category which also includes CAT:Early Scots. Chronologically, though, only Early Scots is really contemporaneous with Middle English, while Middle Scots (except for a 50-year overlap from 1450 to 1500) is contemporaneous with Early Modern English. And all of the entries in CAT:Middle Scots are actually Scots entries anyway, not Middle English (though some have listings for both langauges). So I suggest we formalize the de facto status quo and make Middle Scots an etymology-only variant of Scots rather than of Middle English (but keep Early Scots an etymology-only variant of Middle English). However, one consequence of doing that will be that we can no longer put {{inh|sco|sco-smi}} into Scots etymologies, because an etymology-only variant of a language cannot also be an ancestor of the same language. —Mahāgaja · talk 21:50, 27 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    I wonder if we should change that and allow (modern) languages to derive words from earlier, etymology-only temporal stages of themselves; we had this issue before with people wanting/trying to derive Hebrew words from Biblical Hebrew. Mehhh. Anyway, I agree with the rest of your comment. - -sche (discuss) 05:24, 28 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

RFV failed (for naition). Vox Sciurorum (talk) 11:31, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

snawbuird[edit]

This one is more plausible, snaw + buird, but I haven't seen a citable use. Vox Sciurorum (talk) 17:43, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

RFV failed. Vox Sciurorum (talk) 10:38, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

gemme[edit]

In DSL as an obsolete variation of gem. Vox Sciurorum (talk) 15:12, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

RFV failed. Vox Sciurorum (talk) 10:51, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

More country names[edit]

Algerie[edit]

Andorrae[edit]

Argentinae[edit]

Armenie[edit]

Colombie[edit]

Croatie[edit]

Estonie[edit]

Ethiopie[edit]

Georgie[edit]

Lithuanie[edit]

Mauritanie[edit]

Namibie[edit]

Serbie[edit]

Somalie[edit]

Tanzanie[edit]

Tunisie[edit]

Proper names not in DSL or scots-online.org. Likely coined by the contributor following a pattern because the English -ia to Scots -ie change does show up in some documented place names. Vox Sciurorum (talk) 15:22, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • RFV failed with no citations except for Armenie which I marked as Middle Scots. It is used three times in one pre-1700 work, quotations in A Dictionary of the Older Scottish Tongue. If anybody wants to strictly apply CFI, go ahead and delete it. Otherwise I'm willing to tolerate limited attestation for Middle Scots if it appears in a work considered by DSL to be Scots worth preserving. Vox Sciurorum (talk) 20:56, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Retrieved from "https://en.wiktionary.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Austrick&oldid=65760933"