Talk:BAML
Latest comment: 12 years ago by -sche in topic BAML
The following information passed a request for deletion.
This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.
I just deleted "Binary Application Markup Language". Should we delete this, too? - -sche (discuss) 23:49, 3 March 2012 (UTC)
- Nope. I have changed it from a proper noun to an initialism. They are acceptable here. SemperBlotto (talk) 08:13, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
- Keep. Could pass on "widespread use" if Google Books is a guide — even if the expansion of the initialism is a link to Wikipedia. Equinox ◑ 20:51, 6 March 2012 (UTC)
- Keep Our practice seems to be keep attestable abbreviations. The expanded form could be an
{{only in}}pseudo-entry or we could just go directly from BAML to WP's article. DCDuring TALK 21:38, 8 March 2012 (UTC)
- Ok, kept. - -sche (discuss) 02:47, 16 March 2012 (UTC)